raptor 700r vs quadzilla
03-13-2008, 07:40 PM
#41
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 536
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
dude you compared the fuji engine powered outlaw 500 vs a craptor 700, the fuji was junk i got a ktm 525 and stock it put down 56whp and 41tq (@ 9350rpm and 4450)
also i don't care what you say it has been proven menny times that stock vs stock the outlaw is faster on the topend, accelerating,and arround any type of track
how menny craptors have won sactioned events?
also
http://www.polarisindustries.com/en-...nce/Outlaw525/
as for 96 yes i am wrong i mis read it it says 79mph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-terrain_vehicle
this is a link to a dyno sheet on a 700r with +1mm 11:1 Wiseco, ported head, GYTR full intake and full exhaust, Dobeck Gen II TFi
http://www.exriders.com/vbb/showthre...hreadid=272451
here is a dyno sheet for a stock 525
(mind you this is a 2004 dyno sheet and it is the exc, their trail bike that is verry corked up stock i have read on the net that the outlaw/xc 525's make 30%+ at the rear wheels due to bigger carb,higher comp,more agressive cam, and higher redline) http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/KTM525excDyno.jpg
700r 396lbs dry http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/pr...9/0/specs.aspx
525s 375lbs http://www.powersportstv.com/2008/Po...25S/ATV/24657/
meaning the 700r would require aprox. 11% more power than the outlaw if they were the same weight to run the same (but being as the outlaw 525s is 5% lighter the 700r would need an additional 8% more power so the 700r needs almost 20% more power to be just as fast (so 45hp stock plus 20% and you have 54hp needed to compete with the outlaw 525s i it had the same engine as in the 04 exc but the new engine has over 30% more so the 700r would need aprox. annother 10hp or almost 60hp to compare)
plust you are ------- retardid comparind apples and ricers, just like people with v8's they think just because the engine is twice the size it has more power but we all know they don't
the 700r has less power,weighs more and is not,not,not a race quad it is built for trail riding like a utility not racing the 700r will loose to an outlaw 525s (even the smaller 450mxr) with equil riders on both bikes every time just because it's junk
just think is a 400hp escilade with a 6.0L v8 faster than a 280hp 2.0L evo? i mean it has to be right the excilade has and engine like 3 times the size and 120more hp right?
wrong
also were are comparing the outlaw 525s (straight axle like all sport quads not irs) the 700r is junk plain and simple
also i don't care what you say it has been proven menny times that stock vs stock the outlaw is faster on the topend, accelerating,and arround any type of track
how menny craptors have won sactioned events?
also
http://www.polarisindustries.com/en-...nce/Outlaw525/
as for 96 yes i am wrong i mis read it it says 79mph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-terrain_vehicle
this is a link to a dyno sheet on a 700r with +1mm 11:1 Wiseco, ported head, GYTR full intake and full exhaust, Dobeck Gen II TFi
http://www.exriders.com/vbb/showthre...hreadid=272451
here is a dyno sheet for a stock 525
(mind you this is a 2004 dyno sheet and it is the exc, their trail bike that is verry corked up stock i have read on the net that the outlaw/xc 525's make 30%+ at the rear wheels due to bigger carb,higher comp,more agressive cam, and higher redline) http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/KTM525excDyno.jpg
700r 396lbs dry http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/pr...9/0/specs.aspx
525s 375lbs http://www.powersportstv.com/2008/Po...25S/ATV/24657/
meaning the 700r would require aprox. 11% more power than the outlaw if they were the same weight to run the same (but being as the outlaw 525s is 5% lighter the 700r would need an additional 8% more power so the 700r needs almost 20% more power to be just as fast (so 45hp stock plus 20% and you have 54hp needed to compete with the outlaw 525s i it had the same engine as in the 04 exc but the new engine has over 30% more so the 700r would need aprox. annother 10hp or almost 60hp to compare)
plust you are ------- retardid comparind apples and ricers, just like people with v8's they think just because the engine is twice the size it has more power but we all know they don't
the 700r has less power,weighs more and is not,not,not a race quad it is built for trail riding like a utility not racing the 700r will loose to an outlaw 525s (even the smaller 450mxr) with equil riders on both bikes every time just because it's junk
just think is a 400hp escilade with a 6.0L v8 faster than a 280hp 2.0L evo? i mean it has to be right the excilade has and engine like 3 times the size and 120more hp right?
wrong
also were are comparing the outlaw 525s (straight axle like all sport quads not irs) the 700r is junk plain and simple
03-13-2008, 07:42 PM
#42
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
Originally Posted by Whitey
Only in Johnny Fantasy land.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSxN_sneiO4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozpMvg-OXtI
03-13-2008, 07:50 PM
#43
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
Originally Posted by cornfuzed
dude you compared the fuji engine powered outlaw 500 vs a craptor 700, the fuji was junk i got a ktm 525 and stock it put down 56whp and 41tq (@ 9350rpm and 4450)
also i don't care what you say it has been proven menny times that stock vs stock the outlaw is faster on the topend, accelerating,and arround any type of track
how menny craptors have won sactioned events?
also
http://www.polarisindustries.com/en-...nce/Outlaw525/
as for 96 yes i am wrong i mis read it it says 79mph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-terrain_vehicle
this is a link to a dyno sheet on a 700r with +1mm 11:1 Wiseco, ported head, GYTR full intake and full exhaust, Dobeck Gen II TFi
http://www.exriders.com/vbb/showthre...hreadid=272451
here is a dyno sheet for a stock 525
(mind you this is a 2004 dyno sheet and it is the exc, their trail bike that is verry corked up stock i have read on the net that the outlaw/xc 525's make 30%+ at the rear wheels due to bigger carb,higher comp,more agressive cam, and higher redline) http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/KTM525excDyno.jpg
700r 396lbs dry http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/pr...9/0/specs.aspx
525s 375lbs http://www.powersportstv.com/2008/Po...25S/ATV/24657/
meaning the 700r would require aprox. 11% more power than the outlaw if they were the same weight to run the same (but being as the outlaw 525s is 5% lighter the 700r would need an additional 8% more power so the 700r needs almost 20% more power to be just as fast (so 45hp stock plus 20% and you have 54hp needed to compete with the outlaw 525s i it had the same engine as in the 04 exc but the new engine has over 30% more so the 700r would need aprox. annother 10hp or almost 60hp to compare)
plust you are ------- retardid comparind apples and ricers, just like people with v8's they think just because the engine is twice the size it has more power but we all know they don't
the 700r has less power,weighs more and is not,not,not a race quad it is built for trail riding like a utility not racing the 700r will loose to an outlaw 525s (even the smaller 450mxr) with equil riders on both bikes every time just because it's junk
just think is a 400hp escilade with a 6.0L v8 faster than a 280hp 2.0L evo? i mean it has to be right the excilade has and engine like 3 times the size and 120more hp right?
wrong
also were are comparing the outlaw 525s (straight axle like all sport quads not irs) the 700r is junk plain and simple
also i don't care what you say it has been proven menny times that stock vs stock the outlaw is faster on the topend, accelerating,and arround any type of track
how menny craptors have won sactioned events?
also
http://www.polarisindustries.com/en-...nce/Outlaw525/
as for 96 yes i am wrong i mis read it it says 79mph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-terrain_vehicle
this is a link to a dyno sheet on a 700r with +1mm 11:1 Wiseco, ported head, GYTR full intake and full exhaust, Dobeck Gen II TFi
http://www.exriders.com/vbb/showthre...hreadid=272451
here is a dyno sheet for a stock 525
(mind you this is a 2004 dyno sheet and it is the exc, their trail bike that is verry corked up stock i have read on the net that the outlaw/xc 525's make 30%+ at the rear wheels due to bigger carb,higher comp,more agressive cam, and higher redline) http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/KTM525excDyno.jpg
700r 396lbs dry http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/pr...9/0/specs.aspx
525s 375lbs http://www.powersportstv.com/2008/Po...25S/ATV/24657/
meaning the 700r would require aprox. 11% more power than the outlaw if they were the same weight to run the same (but being as the outlaw 525s is 5% lighter the 700r would need an additional 8% more power so the 700r needs almost 20% more power to be just as fast (so 45hp stock plus 20% and you have 54hp needed to compete with the outlaw 525s i it had the same engine as in the 04 exc but the new engine has over 30% more so the 700r would need aprox. annother 10hp or almost 60hp to compare)
plust you are ------- retardid comparind apples and ricers, just like people with v8's they think just because the engine is twice the size it has more power but we all know they don't
the 700r has less power,weighs more and is not,not,not a race quad it is built for trail riding like a utility not racing the 700r will loose to an outlaw 525s (even the smaller 450mxr) with equil riders on both bikes every time just because it's junk
just think is a 400hp escilade with a 6.0L v8 faster than a 280hp 2.0L evo? i mean it has to be right the excilade has and engine like 3 times the size and 120more hp right?
wrong
also were are comparing the outlaw 525s (straight axle like all sport quads not irs) the 700r is junk plain and simple
the first time you race a raptor stock v stock or mod v mod you will shut your **** hole. come race my raptor and i'll blow your ------- doors off.
this and that about 11% more hp blah blah bullshit have you ever heard of gearing? you're a complete and utter CLOWN, you have no clue what you're talking about.
the outlaw 525 is not even close to the fastest sport quad.
i already posted a dyno graph 700r rapt and outlaw 525 ON THE SAME DYNO, RIGHT AFTER EACH OTHER. rapt has more hp, 10+ft-lbs more torque, better gearing, roughly same weight, better traction... YOU LOSE.
you are a complete loser, anytime you want to get destoryed by my stock raptor, i'm willing, and will video tape it, and post it here for everyone to see you lose. then im going to hold you down and let perk360 fart on you and you will probably die
LOSER
03-13-2008, 07:52 PM
#44
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
prove your shitty outlaw 525 can beat a raptor 700r stock for stock or mod for mod. or shutup.
i already posted numerous videos of outlaws getting worked by everything, and videos of rapt destorying everything, and a dyno sheet of the two on the same dyno right after eachother.
i already posted numerous videos of outlaws getting worked by everything, and videos of rapt destorying everything, and a dyno sheet of the two on the same dyno right after eachother.
03-13-2008, 07:54 PM
#45
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u610NltCJKA
watch the outlaw 525 get destoryed by everything
yes the raptor is the white quad.
there is a reason everyone who doesn't have a rapt 700 hates them and talks e----- and never does anything about it, and there is a reason everyone with them talks them up...
watch the outlaw 525 get destoryed by everything
yes the raptor is the white quad.
there is a reason everyone who doesn't have a rapt 700 hates them and talks e----- and never does anything about it, and there is a reason everyone with them talks them up...
03-13-2008, 07:55 PM
#46
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
03-13-2008, 07:55 PM
#47
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
03-13-2008, 07:55 PM
#48
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
03-13-2008, 10:00 PM
#50
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: raptor 700r vs quadzilla
Originally Posted by CoreyR
youre wrong raptors are superior to everything because johnny owns one. if he was riding a 250 he would make an arguement that its the best cquad ever because its light and has a shaft drive so it never needs chains like other quads.
bottom line any 450>raptor700
how about the new polaris 525 with the KTM motor. that would rape a raptor also.
bottom line any 450>raptor700
how about the new polaris 525 with the KTM motor. that would rape a raptor also.
