Owned by srt-4
#42
Re:Owned by srt-4
Originally Posted by BoosTedZSix
i was talking about the neon having that much boost since obviously the 350z isnt boosted...and i just heard it had a 1 year warrenty...yeah and the the 350 is pretty dope...and hp doesnt really matter if your car weighs a grip right....so id say power to weight is what really matters
#44
Re:Owned by srt-4
Hey, i have a Chrysler 300m and it is a pretty nice car. bought it for short money after i sold my 96 civic. i had enough money to build the engine i have now. the srt-4 is still a dodge. and i say one better, at Best Buy i pulled up to one and he had the biggest srt-4sticker going across his whole car and he looked like an idiot. No-one can escape "Rice-idist"
#45
Re:Owned by srt-4
no offense guys but i dont think there is many guys on this site that could take out a SRT-4. ohh im shure there is a few, but just a few.
your just all pissed that when a domestic car company decided to make a "perfomance" sport compact its fast as ----, unlike the Si's and Spec-v's. ohh yea and they are cheaper cause because ya dont have to pay for the boat ride over!
your just all pissed that when a domestic car company decided to make a "perfomance" sport compact its fast as ----, unlike the Si's and Spec-v's. ohh yea and they are cheaper cause because ya dont have to pay for the boat ride over!
#46
Re:Owned by srt-4
Originally Posted by TurboShadow
no offense guys but i dont think there is many guys on this site that could take out a SRT-4. ohh im shure there is a few, but just a few.
your just all pissed that when a domestic car company decided to make a "perfomance" sport compact its fast as ----, unlike the Si's and Spec-v's. ohh yea and they are cheaper cause because ya dont have to pay for the boat ride over!
your just all pissed that when a domestic car company decided to make a "perfomance" sport compact its fast as ----, unlike the Si's and Spec-v's. ohh yea and they are cheaper cause because ya dont have to pay for the boat ride over!
Wow that was funny. But you done and pissed em all off now. I just think its funny that most of these people drive honda's and really.. Not much better than any other econobox.
I dont care if a srt is a neon. You cant complain about a car that has 240+ pounds of torque stock and horsepower to match.
I enjoy this website a lot. Its just sad everyone is so damn opinionated.
#47
Re:Owned by srt-4
yeah but u got to think about it. they built that motor to compensate for turbo. so say if i was to build a motor for turbo and run that amount of boost on my motor. i would surely make more power than that thing.
#48
Re:Owned by srt-4
It's just as opinionated to say the SRT4(NEON) will smoke most of the members on this site and defend the SRT4 like you have been. Obviously your opinions are biased because you own a NEON and ours are too since most of us drive Hondas. You like what you drive. There is no problem with that. Get over it....
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#49
Re:Owned by srt-4
Originally Posted by BoosTedZSix
yeah but u got to think about it. they built that motor to compensate for turbo. so say if i was to build a motor for turbo and run that amount of boost on my motor. i would surely make more power than that thing.
would a honda motor made for forced induction make that much torque?
probably not, it may however make more horsepower because of the more revs.
hp sells cars torque wins races?
#50
Re:Owned by srt-4
okay the srt4 has a 2.4 liter turbo motor. on like 16 lbs of boosti think thats about right. okay say i had an h22 built for turbo as the srt motor is. with the same size turbo with the same amount of boost. i would say the h22 would have more hp and torque than the 2.4 dodge motor. can someone back me up on this??