Owned by srt-4
03-05-2004, 11:13 AM
#21
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Re:Owned by srt-4
You know thats a ------- good idea. Why didn't dodge just discontinued the neon and when they built the srt-4 make a whole new name for it? That would have been smart..
As far as racing a srt=4 with a stock engine...of course your going to lose. You better have an sti or 350z to be able to beat those ******* if your car isn't boosted
As far as racing a srt=4 with a stock engine...of course your going to lose. You better have an sti or 350z to be able to beat those ******* if your car isn't boosted
03-05-2004, 11:20 AM
#22
1.0 BAR
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 433
Re:Owned by srt-4
Neons are crappy, but the srt-4 is fast. Thats pretty much it.
Every dodge / chrysler car I have ever seen past the age of 4 years has paint problems. My girls chrysler roof was bald metal by the time she sold it, they just dont invest in theor paint jobs.
Every dodge / chrysler car I have ever seen past the age of 4 years has paint problems. My girls chrysler roof was bald metal by the time she sold it, they just dont invest in theor paint jobs.
03-05-2004, 11:23 AM
#23
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,387
Re:Owned by srt-4
Originally Posted by airtonics
Originally Posted by jake2001z001
atleast is was a srt-4, You will own him with boost
That doesn't mean with boost you will own him. Unless you break a 13 sec run boosted your still going to lose. I've seen a lot of boosted honda's on here not even break into the 14's depending on their engine. So i suppose it depends on what you have now
03-05-2004, 11:24 AM
#24
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,067
Re:Owned by srt-4
Chrysler has a good history of factory turbocharged cars. Easily upgradage and handle a lot of power look at the old 2.2 turbos. Guss had his van running what high 12's low 13
s with fairly minimal mods.
As for a 350z beating an srt-4 ummm no. I think the 350z's only run mid 14's so even in the slowfire I could keep up with one of those if not win.
s with fairly minimal mods.
As for a 350z beating an srt-4 ummm no. I think the 350z's only run mid 14's so even in the slowfire I could keep up with one of those if not win.
03-05-2004, 11:24 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re:Owned by srt-4
Hah! i just beat one the other day and it had a stage 1 upgrade on it. his mods were chipped ecu, bigger injectors, k&n filter, and some other ----. i got a 91 crx si (stock d16a6) T3 turbo @ 9psi. he got me off the launch cuz i just sit there spinning but as soon as i threw it in second i was up on his *** again then popped it into third and damn i just stared pulling right by him!!! 
GO SINGLE CAM TURBO GO!!!!!! 
they're fast but i think a good HMT kit would take one out!
GO SINGLE CAM TURBO GO!!!!!! they're fast but i think a good HMT kit would take one out!
03-05-2004, 11:40 AM
#26
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Re:Owned by srt-4
the 350z will not lose to the srt-4 its 1/4 is 14.0 flat and the srt-4 is 14.2. There are records too that show they have the same 1/4 mile time. Heres the link I found about the 350z http://nissan.jbroadtests.com/Z/2003/index4.php
And this is the srt-4 http://www.fantasycars.com/sedans/html/neonsrt.html
And this is the srt-4 http://www.fantasycars.com/sedans/html/neonsrt.html
03-05-2004, 11:46 AM
#27
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 515
Re:Owned by srt-4
Whitey,
Just to let you know the Pinto was only the most dangerous car on the road because it was rushed into production. The guys over at Ford developed a fuel bladder to go inside the tank so when the tank was punctured or something it wouldnt explode. howevwer they thought it wasnt cost effective and left it out. with that bladder in the tank the pinto was one of the safest cars around with all the other saftey feature that were added.
Just to let you know the Pinto was only the most dangerous car on the road because it was rushed into production. The guys over at Ford developed a fuel bladder to go inside the tank so when the tank was punctured or something it wouldnt explode. howevwer they thought it wasnt cost effective and left it out. with that bladder in the tank the pinto was one of the safest cars around with all the other saftey feature that were added.
03-05-2004, 12:03 PM
#29
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,107
Re:Owned by srt-4
that guy must suck at driving.. you kept up within 3 cars
so with everything you have, you run ~15.0? those things are suppose to run 14.0 if not i've seen 13.9 stock. i'm guessing he was a shitty driver like the one i saw at rockfalls raceway last summer, he ------- got a blue srt-4 and ran at BEST a 15.2 
so with everything you have, you run ~15.0? those things are suppose to run 14.0 if not i've seen 13.9 stock. i'm guessing he was a shitty driver like the one i saw at rockfalls raceway last summer, he ------- got a blue srt-4 and ran at BEST a 15.2
03-05-2004, 12:56 PM
#30
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Re:Owned by srt-4
Originally Posted by Researcher
Whitey,
Just to let you know the Pinto was only the most dangerous car on the road because it was rushed into production. The guys over at Ford developed a fuel bladder to go inside the tank so when the tank was punctured or something it wouldnt explode. howevwer they thought it wasnt cost effective and left it out. with that bladder in the tank the pinto was one of the safest cars around with all the other saftey feature that were added.
Just to let you know the Pinto was only the most dangerous car on the road because it was rushed into production. The guys over at Ford developed a fuel bladder to go inside the tank so when the tank was punctured or something it wouldnt explode. howevwer they thought it wasnt cost effective and left it out. with that bladder in the tank the pinto was one of the safest cars around with all the other saftey feature that were added.
