General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

New project since NE aint gonna happen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2006, 03:51 PM
  #31  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

dude why waste gas just put a 2.9 ford v6 in there ditch the 4 barrel
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 04:01 PM
  #32  
0.0 BAR
 
jinxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

Originally Posted by random-strike
dude why waste gas just put a 2.9 ford v6 in there ditch the 4 barrel
to big. escort sohc motor.
jinxy is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 05:13 PM
  #33  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Cadracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 366
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

Ok some one needs to do there home work on carbs. holley vs q-jet fuel usage holley will use probably 2 gallons an hour compared to the q jet 1 an hr.


Holley 600 vacum secondaries all throttle plates same size...............600cfm will also need new manifold $$$
Q-jet small primaries Huge secondaries ........................................795 cfm no manifold needed stock aluminum saves $$$$. Already i have save 200 towards the fuel an another 100 not buying a holley already had the q-jet an also probably will save 2.50 per hr while running if just running the primaries.Thats my 2 cents worth....
Also you would have to run 2 4cyl ford engine due to the size of this boat.Ask Jeff he has been aboard an its not a skiff...LOL

Do you think your gonna be wide open all the time ? if you are i have the wrong boat for that.

Cadracer is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 05:17 PM
  #34  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

Originally Posted by Cadracer
Ok some one needs to do there home work on carbs. holley vs q-jet fuel usage holley will use probably 2 gallons an hour compared to the q jet 1 an hr.


Holley 600 vacum secondaries all throttle plates same size...............600cfm will also need new manifold $$$
Q-jet small primaries Huge secondaries ........................................795 cfm no manifold needed stock aluminum saves $$$$. Already i have save 200 towards the fuel an another 100 not buying a holley already had the q-jet an also probably will save 2.50 per hr while running if just running the primaries.Thats my 2 cents worth....
Also you would have to run 2 4cyl ford engine due to the size of this boat.Ask Jeff he has been aboard an its not a skiff...LOL

Do you think your gonna be wide open all the time ? if you are i have the wrong boat for that.



the small primaries will save you gas cruising or idling around
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 05:20 PM
  #35  
0.0 BAR
 
Smith-02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

Originally Posted by Cadracer
Ok some one needs to do there home work on carbs. holley vs q-jet fuel usage holley will use probably 2 gallons an hour compared to the q jet 1 an hr.


Holley 600 vacum secondaries all throttle plates same size...............600cfm will also need new manifold $$$
Q-jet small primaries Huge secondaries ........................................795 cfm no manifold needed stock aluminum saves $$$$. Already i have save 200 towards the fuel an another 100 not buying a holley already had the q-jet an also probably will save 2.50 per hr while running if just running the primaries.Thats my 2 cents worth....
Also you would have to run 2 4cyl ford engine due to the size of this boat.Ask Jeff he has been aboard an its not a skiff...LOL

Do you think your gonna be wide open all the time ? if you are i have the wrong boat for that.


okay, since when does your 800cfm > 600cfm in gal/hr comsumption?

run smaller jets, and be done with it. you aren't going to use any more fuel than you would putting around with either, until you crack it wide open. smaller throttle bore = more vacuum across the jets = more intaked fuel. i have never known, seen, or heard of a qjet getting BETTER mileage than a holley for as long as i can remember...

#61 jets are about spot on, +/-2 on the size
Smith-02 is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 02:35 AM
  #36  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Cadracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 366
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

Well you set it up your way ill do mine.The engine runs choice got her up an running tonight.an the primaries are half as big as a primary on a holley carb.Doesnt matter i have many years of tuning q-jet for both preformance an economy.
Cadracer is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 02:54 AM
  #37  
3.0 BAR
 
buk9tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

4.3l v6 is wheres its at.
buk9tp is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 02:57 AM
  #38  
3.0 BAR
 
buk9tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

---- 4.3 v6 powers everything from cars/trucks/boats/planes

turbo/na fully built/nos/supercharged

---- why isnt the after market bigger than it is
buk9tp is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 03:45 AM
  #39  
0.0 BAR
 
Smith-02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

Originally Posted by buk9tp
---- 4.3 v6 powers everything from cars/trucks/boats/planes

turbo/na fully built/nos/supercharged

---- why isnt the after market bigger than it is
because you can't cut up a v8 to make a v6!
Smith-02 is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 04:13 AM
  #40  
3.0 BAR
 
buk9tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Default Re: New project since NE aint gonna happen

Originally Posted by c0mpl3x
because you can't cut up a v8 to make a v6!
lol if you want to dumb it down ALOT.. gm made the 4.3 by removing 2 cylinders from a v8


check out the new 2007 4.3
195hp, 260ft lbs.



http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...ew/07i_LU3.doc

i smell sex and candyyyyyy
buk9tp is offline  


Quick Reply: New project since NE aint gonna happen



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.