General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2008, 11:56 PM
  #1  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
StratCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
Default Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

Im in the market for a tig welder. Im debating between the Syncrowave 200 which is at the local welding supply store, they want 2K for it on sale right now. Looks like a great tig and I can weld aluminum with it w/ ac hf. But I was cruising ebay and found the econotig for about 1500 shipped, but it doesnt look like it has high frequency but is ac compatable. I dont really want scratch start but to save 500 bucks it might be worth it. There are alot of great welders on here that know alot more about these then I do, anyone w/ first hand experience w/ either of these could you give your opinion?
StratCoupe is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 11:58 PM
  #2  
1.0 BAR
 
sexyblackcrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 347
Default Re: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

I have a synchro an its better than pockets in my underwear
sexyblackcrx is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 12:18 AM
  #4  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
StratCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
Default Re: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

Split the difference. I got a new Lincoln precision 225 ready pack for $1800
Im looking at the 08 lincoln catalog and that looks like a pretty nice machine but I cant find if it is high frequency?
StratCoupe is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 05:12 PM
  #6  
0.0 BAR
 
scrubnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 12
Default Re: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

The Econotig must have HF to do aluminum. You cannot scratch start aluminum; you will contaminate your tungsten. I believe the difference between the two is that the Econotig has regular AC for aluminum while the Synchrowave has square wave for aluminum. I used the Synchrowave 250 at school on our MiniBaja project. That thing rocks! If you're doing a lot of aluminum, you might want the Synchrowave, otherwise, the Econotig is fine.
scrubnick is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 09:44 PM
  #7  
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
 
t_cel_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

yeah the syncrowave is better in my opinion as it has a higher duty cycle then the econotig, i think the econotig has a max of 150 amps at like 20% duty cycle. that means in 10 min you can weld for 2 min befor you have to let it cool down.

found actual specs
econotig 20% @ 150 amp 15 volts
syncrowave 40% @150 amp 25 volts
t_cel_t is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:41 AM
  #8  
1.5 BAR
 
G2turbo_terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

Used econotigs go for around 1000-1200. Between those two, I'd get the syncrowave. It doesn't seem like you have weighted all you options either, keep reading before you spend $$$.

G2turbo_terror is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 03:12 AM
  #9  
3.0 BAR
 
the 13th round's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,618
Default Re: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

http://www.millerwelds.com/diversion...FSY1agod6SG0lQ

like 1400-1500 bucks.
the 13th round is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 12:27 PM
  #10  
USS
0.0 BAR
 
USS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200

That looks pretty sweet. I think if I were to buy a nice 230V welder I would go with something like that. I'm a hobbiest, not a pro
USS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ADSR
Fabrication
16
04-09-2009 10:34 PM
SQ is the SQUAD
Turbo Parts For Sale
2
06-07-2008 11:13 PM
SQ is the SQUAD
Turbo Parts For Sale
3
03-31-2007 11:09 PM
Ravage70
Fabrication
4
02-21-2006 09:50 PM
Turbo Tin Can
Fabrication
8
10-24-2005 10:26 PM



Quick Reply: Miller Econotig vs. Syncrowave 200



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.