ls1 vs everyone
#22
Re: ls1 vs everyone
Originally Posted by jmhalder
nonetheless, grats on buying a car that was already fast... dont worry i'll have some LS1 stomping times sometime in april
i've had and built several cars faster in the 1/4 than yours.
go stick your ****** *** 240 pos up your ***
#23
Re: ls1 vs everyone
Originally Posted by CoreyR
if i spent 15K on a "muscle" car i would expect it to go AT LEAST that fast. terminators go 110+ stock, weigh more then a vert F body, should they get a cookie too?
im not asking a cookie you clown i simply posted the videos.
i didn't buy the car to be the fastest possible, and a SVT cobra mustang typicaly costs about 10k more than a z28 camaro
#24
Re: ls1 vs everyone
Originally Posted by random-strike
no just the stock tires which are 245s :/
i am pretty happy about the 107.56 trap speed. no induction modifications, just the exhaust.
the convertible adds 300-400lbs over the hardtop :/
yea maybe you should've.
i ran 13.32 with less than .1% of your modifications.
horray for you!!!! :1
i am pretty happy about the 107.56 trap speed. no induction modifications, just the exhaust.
the convertible adds 300-400lbs over the hardtop :/
yea maybe you should've.
i ran 13.32 with less than .1% of your modifications.
horray for you!!!! :1
does having an engine more than 2x the size of his count as more than 2x his mods?
#27
Re: ls1 vs everyone
Originally Posted by QikEnuF
Good times for a vert, get some bigger/stickier rears and a ported LS6. Not sure what years came with it stock, but decent upgrade I hear.
what would help me now is a tune.
Originally Posted by jacob
does having an engine more than 2x the size of his count as more than 2x his mods?
before you go nutz using a turbocharger is "supercharging"
Originally Posted by Dmc1
You should have bought a TA. Everyone i see at the tracks around here are running around 12.80. 2.1 60s rwd and 245s how is the driver not the problem.
i pulled a couple 2.1 60 foots RWD :1 on my 245s but not consitantly.
woogie boogie
#28
Re: ls1 vs everyone
Originally Posted by random-strike
you -> :1
no honda has ever been made that will trap 107.56 with $300 into it.
no honda has ever been made that will trap 107.56 with $300 into it.
i built for a budy an 89fox mustan (5.0L like 210hp or somthing stock) he bought for $800 threw in a $600 250hp shot of nitrous and $150 for more braided stainless lines and more jets and solenoid so there was a second stage (to make arround 500additional hp) threw on some 10inch slicks (i think the were mt 28x10x15's and were radials, street legal) for arround $250 (craigslist find) and a $35 shift kit and $50 trans brake (craigslist find) so arround 1k in performance and $800 in a car
1st run- all motor,t-brake 14.3@88mph with a 2.3-60' (launched about 3500rpm)
2nd run-hit nitrous at about the 60' line (1 stage) 13.34@104 2.24-60' (launched at 4k, all following are launched at 4k)
3rd run-nitrous launch 13.1@ 109 2.5-60' (bogged on launch because to much fuel not enough nitrous)
4th run-everything (both stages launched, but at 2500rpm) 11.43@ 118 with a 1.98 60' and 1 wheel about 6inches in the air for arroun 15ft
would have run better with traction bars and bigger tires also trans was starting to slip (there would be a run 5 but i blew up launching, i should have run high 10's at arround 130)
moral, unless you are willing to pay to do it right (or kinda the right way) you will pay in the end