General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Just for Jonny

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2008, 01:08 PM
  #11  
1.0 BAR
 
cornfuzed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 536
Default Re: Just for Jonny

Originally Posted by doug684
I wouldn't post much if I was you. Your on a short leash already.
---- you
i don't give a ---- about what you have to say
cornfuzed is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 01:10 PM
  #12  
1.0 BAR
 
cornfuzed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 536
Default Re: Just for Jonny

Originally Posted by julio_bOOstamante
is this what you guys mean by posting wrong info? lmao
what is that supposed to mean?
what beause i like engines that are built to make power and last (i.e. toyota not some shitty 60year old chevy pushrod engine)
is wrong info and i brought up an occasion in witch i saw a lexus at the track that was running 9.3's and when i asked the guy what was in it that is what he said?
how if the posting wrong info or giving bad advice?

do tell me...
cornfuzed is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 01:14 PM
  #13  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: Just for Jonny

ban cornfuzed :1

or change this to "cornfuzed" :1
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 01:14 PM
  #14  
0.0 BAR
 
Oscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 0
Default Re: Just for Jonny

because its wrong :1
Oscar is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 02:37 PM
  #16  
1.0 BAR
 
cornfuzed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 536
Default Re: Just for Jonny

Originally Posted by jacer63
3 words... NHRA PRO STOCK they run "pushrod motors" rev to 9800 and go 6.50's
you and your valve float thoughts are starting to get funny.
ls series are the new modern v8
and they run valve springs heavy enough to hold up your mom
cornfuzed is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 02:46 PM
  #17  
1.0 BAR
 
jmhalder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 423
Default Re: Just for Jonny

go ---- yourself Cornfuzed, albeit the 1UZ is a great engine, its still a 4.0l in stock form that makes 250hp, lol... if it was my S-chassis i was swappin a V8 into, it'd be a LS1, or if available a VK45DE (350hp) or more likely the older VH45DE(275hp) go ---- your 1UZ... not to mention it wouldnt be bad to keep the engine in the same family... as mentioned, nissan V8 or LSx ftw.
jmhalder is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 02:49 PM
  #18  
0.0 BAR
 
Econo-Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: Just for Jonny

Originally Posted by cornfuzed
what is that supposed to mean?
what beause i like engines that are built to make power and last (i.e. toyota not some shitty 60year old chevy pushrod engine)
is wrong info and i brought up an occasion in witch i saw a lexus at the track that was running 9.3's and when i asked the guy what was in it that is what he said?
how if the posting wrong info or giving bad advice?

do tell me...
LS1 is not a 60 year old engine you ------ **** and the OHC engine has been around since like 1910 you fuckign tool bag. Nothing any newer there. are you seriously saying that a ijz is a better engine tha a ls1? are you kidding. so the whole pro drag car thing is out the window cause they use
Originally Posted by cornfuzed
and they run valve springs heavy enough to hold up your mom
but yet i guess this little tale was supposed to be a stock 1uz?

Originally Posted by cornfuzed
---- that i would rather a 1uz-fe toyota v8, i have seen them run like 1000hp on 1.5bar and pump gas (and meth injection) it was sweet
i think it was a lexus ls400 or somthing it was in the guy said it was street legal and when i wasen't dumping the exhaust through the cutout it even passed e-check
Right so you think he got 1000hp on a stock engine. this explains why your email is after an engine you have never touched and know nothing about. rb26ttsky huh? have you ever seen a skyline?

you know nothing once again. do you ever post ANYTHING with a thread of accuracy?

Yes juilo this is exactly what we were all talking about
Econo-Box is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 02:53 PM
  #19  
0.0 BAR
 
b18.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: Just for Jonny

Originally Posted by cornfuzed
and they run valve springs heavy enough to hold up your mom
"The L76/L92/LS3 cylinder heads are the most advanced small block heads to date. They use 2.165" (55 mm) intake valves, and 1.59" (40.4 mm) exhaust valves. For use with 4" and larger bores, they allow for over 600 hp naturally aspirated. Improved manufacturing efficiency makes these heads cheaper than the outgoing LS6 heads, and severely undercuts aftermarket heads. The large valves, however, limit maximum rpm - 6000 in the L76 (with AFM), and 6600 in the LS3 (with hollow stem valves)."

And about the LS7:

"Peak output is 505 hp (377 kW) at 6300 rpm and 470 ft·lbf (637 N·m) at 4800 rpm with a 7000 rpm redline setting a new record for a production overhead valve pushrod engine.[citation needed] During GM's reliability testing of this engine in its prototype phase, the LS7 was remarked to have been repeatedly tested to be 8000 rpm capable, although power was not made at that rpm level, due to the restraints of the camshaft's profile and the intake manifold ability to flow required air at that engine speed."

Shut the ---- up already, the motor is a tank. Yea they used to drop valves on occasion early in their production life, especially the LT series of iron blocks but jesus ------- christ you think that metallurgy hasn't gone anywhere in the past 30 years?
b18. is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 02:55 PM
  #20  
0.0 BAR
 
Econo-Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: Just for Jonny

Originally Posted by wafflesincars
"The L76/L92/LS3 cylinder heads are the most advanced small block heads to date. They use 2.165" (55 mm) intake valves, and 1.59" (40.4 mm) exhaust valves. For use with 4" and larger bores, they allow for over 600 hp naturally aspirated. Improved manufacturing efficiency makes these heads cheaper than the outgoing LS6 heads, and severely undercuts aftermarket heads. The large valves, however, limit maximum rpm - 6000 in the L76 (with AFM), and 6600 in the LS3 (with hollow stem valves)."

And about the LS7:

"Peak output is 505 hp (377 kW) at 6300 rpm and 470 ft·lbf (637 N·m) at 4800 rpm with a 7000 rpm redline setting a new record for a production overhead valve pushrod engine.[citation needed] During GM's reliability testing of this engine in its prototype phase, the LS7 was remarked to have been repeatedly tested to be 8000 rpm capable, although power was not made at that rpm level, due to the restraints of the camshaft's profile and the intake manifold ability to flow required air at that engine speed."

Shut the ---- up already, the motor is a tank. Yea they used to drop valves on occasion early in their production life, especially the LT series of iron blocks but jesus ------- christ you think that metallurgy hasn't gone anywhere in the past 30 years?
well that and the dip ---- doesnt even understand differences of a LT vs ls or any other SB that GM pumped out over a 60 year period. you're right cornhole, they are alllll the same
Econo-Box is offline  


Quick Reply: Just for Jonny



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.