jackson racing supercharger
10-01-2003, 08:32 PM
#12
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,101
Re:jackson racing supercharger
wow this is the first argument turbo/SC that hasned ended in a brawl. Any way i have a crappy recording on one at 10 PSI on a civic Si 2000. here it is: http://www.jdmdelsol.com/super/5best.wav
I like it personally and will beat a turboed SOHC VTEC at 13 PSI. yes this was tested at the local track.
I like it personally and will beat a turboed SOHC VTEC at 13 PSI. yes this was tested at the local track.
. Personally I don't want a car that just sounds fast.
10-02-2003, 01:24 PM
#18
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,058
Re:jackson racing supercharger
Originally Posted by onyx
wow this is the first argument turbo/SC that hasned ended in a brawl. Any way i have a crappy recording on one at 10 PSI on a civic Si 2000. here it is: http://www.jdmdelsol.com/super/5best.wav
I like it personally and will beat a turboed SOHC VTEC at 13 PSI. yes this was tested at the local track.
I like it personally and will beat a turboed SOHC VTEC at 13 PSI. yes this was tested at the local track.
10-02-2003, 01:47 PM
#20
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 369
Re:jackson racing supercharger
I don't think too much of centrifugal superchargers because why bother having lag and lose out on the advantages of a turbine driving your compressor? Roots blowers and whipple chargers are better because they are positive displacement and more efficient than cetrifugal superchargers overall. I guess my real argument is the fact that an exhuast turbine can spin up a compressor pretty fast without a hell of a lot of exhaust pressure while a crank-driven centrifugal compressor has to wait around for its RPM unless coupled to a very well adjusted CVT.
