General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

iowa

Old 01-05-2008, 05:12 PM
  #41  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

ok so 95%

J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 05:24 PM
  #42  
3.0 BAR
 
CspecRun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: iowa

^^ That graph does not support your claim that the upper class pays 98% OR 95% of the ------' income tax collected in this country. You're gonna have to do better Johnny...
CspecRun is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 06:13 PM
  #43  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by CspecRun
^^ That graph does not support your claim that the upper class pays 98% OR 95% of the ------' income tax collected in this country. You're gonna have to do better Johnny...
those are figures from the government. bush and cheney doctored them right?
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 06:13 PM
  #44  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

http://www.house.gov/jec/
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 06:29 PM
  #45  
1.5 BAR
 
Inquisition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 676
Default Re: iowa

Johnny, post up the break down of how much each quintile makes. I think it's going to be had claiming that the 4th quintile is "the rich" unless you think someone making roughly $60k a year is rich. If you want to make a claim that roughly half of all income tax collected is from the rich, then MAYBE I can get behind that.
Inquisition is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 07:19 PM
  #46  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by Inquisition
Johnny, post up the break down of how much each quintile makes. I think it's going to be had claiming that the 4th quintile is "the rich" unless you think someone making roughly $60k a year is rich. If you want to make a claim that roughly half of all income tax collected is from the rich, then MAYBE I can get behind that.
yes and the dems include people who make 60k as "the rich" and shouldn't get any tax breaks.
just look at their tax proposals through the years...
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 07:21 PM
  #47  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa





J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 07:42 PM
  #49  
1.5 BAR
 
Inquisition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 676
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by random-strike
yes and the dems include people who make 60k as "the rich" and shouldn't get any tax breaks.
just look at their tax proposals through the years...
What are you talking about? People that make $60k aren't rich by anyone's standards. According to you, the rich are people that make over $25k a year. Get some data on how much the people make in each quintile. Then restate the fact that 95% of income tax is paid by the wealthy.
Inquisition is offline  
Old 01-05-2008, 07:59 PM
  #50  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by Inquisition
What are you talking about? People that make $60k aren't rich by anyone's standards. According to you, the rich are people that make over $25k a year. Get some data on how much the people make in each quintile. Then restate the fact that 95% of income tax is paid by the wealthy.
as just previously stated, go check who the dems think is "rich"

thats why they were included.

even if you go by reasonable standards its about 60-70% income tax paid by people who make over 100k a year.
J-SMITH69 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: iowa



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.