mycrx

anyone downloaded any Bruce Lee vids b4? He has some pretty neat stuff in a couple on them.

90 SiR Hatchie

Exactly why bruce Lee was the best there was.

samuraibill

I can't believe that you just said that. You must be gay.

h22a92Accord

Bruce Lee would destroy anyone he faced in the UFC or anywhere for that matter. Obviously you ar not that educated about Martial Arts because anyone who can kill someone by throwing a punch from an inch away is dangerous. Bruce Lee was the best and always will be, just like Jordan and Ali. However as far as the UFC goes Gracie was the best. Most fights in the street or anywhere end up on the ground and if you are as skilled as Gracie was then you were done. There would be no referee to stop the fight, no tap-outs, basically you are going to get hurt, bad. And for the guy who was in tournaments, well what you pretty much said is that the BJJ guy you fought probably would have kicked your *** if there was no judges or referee to stop the fight. It's a tournament, and I have been in a lot of them, and if one person is "too agressive" they got disqualified, but that doesn't mean that there techniques are unaffective, it means that they didn't follow the rules of the tournament, but take it to the street and see who would have won. I believe the best combination for a well rounded fighter is Muay Thai and BJJ. They can hurt you standing up and they can hurt you on the ground. And kicks aren't for ****. If your in a desperate situation and you kick your opponent to get him off of you would you still say kicks are for ****. I'm not sure about you, but I've been kicked a lot and believe me they hurt, doesn't matter were you get kicked, it hurts, that's if the person knows how to kick.

FastLS

I agree. Bruce Lee is God. We should make him president so the country could save millions on security. He could beat up anybody that wanted to kill him, or even tried to kill him. He could kill anybody, and everybody.

You and everybody else. Those styles complement each other, but I believe any effective fighter of one art can overcome situations when faced with a sub-part fighter of two arts.

Most of this is ---- flinging is just opinion. I can say apples are better than oranges and the only justification that I'm right should only be myself. No body else.

So to say that one art is better than the other is pure falsehood through and through. A lot of this speculation will fall under chance, 'would have's and 'what if''s. So cut the ---- and stop arguing about ---- that doesn't matter. Unless you're in a primal fight over something that has meaning to you, then don't worry about it. Matter of fact, avoid fights at all cost and keep your opinion valid and not time tested, otherwise you might end up dead. These arts have already been time tested and that is why the live on today.

h22a92Accord

No I like oranges better. . And I never said that one art is better than another, what I was referring to was what art would make a well-roundedfighter and I mentioned those two arts. No art is better than any other and I totally agree with what you said about no fighting because that's exactly what martial arts are about. There about keeping the peace, discipline and honesty, loyalty, respect and I could go on and on. So we are all allowed are opinions, but please don't go mixing up what I said.