I'm on a boat.
02-09-2009, 05:46 PM
#31
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by Tough-guy
Re-read this statement, correct your grammatical errors, then preach to me about premises, substance, structure, logic, and syntax. 
The first statement is a simple if then
(P -> Q)
The second statement is the same substituting if with when and omitting then.
The third sentence is a simple sentence with no logical connectives.
The forth is an overly worded sentence using and as the logical connective that could have been tautologically correct if I had also written it like
"It is not the case that if I was not just poking at you because you were acting like an authority on an arbitrary subject that has an associated racial stigma attached to a good I happen to like, then you took it too far.
The fifth sentence could be written as such, also.
The diagram for that is
~(~P->Q)
I'll continue preaching to you about premises as that final argument is logically invalid. It is not the case that if there are inconsistencies in my delivery, that my statement is untrue.
02-09-2009, 05:50 PM
#32
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,651
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
Why don't you correct my grammatical errors.
The first statement is a simple if then
(P -> Q)
The second statement is the same substituting if with when and omitting then.
The third sentence is a simple sentence with no logical connectives.
The forth is an overly worded sentence using and as the logical connective that could have been tautologically correct if I had also written it like
"It is not the case that if I was just poking at you because you were acting like an authority on an arbitrary subject that has an associated racial stigma attached to a good I happen to like, then you too it too far.
The fifth sentence could be written as such, also.
The diagram for that is
~(~P->Q)
I'll continue preaching to you about premises as that final argument is logically invalid. It is not the case that if there are inconsistencies in my delivery, that my statement is untrue.
The first statement is a simple if then
(P -> Q)
The second statement is the same substituting if with when and omitting then.
The third sentence is a simple sentence with no logical connectives.
The forth is an overly worded sentence using and as the logical connective that could have been tautologically correct if I had also written it like
"It is not the case that if I was just poking at you because you were acting like an authority on an arbitrary subject that has an associated racial stigma attached to a good I happen to like, then you too it too far.
The fifth sentence could be written as such, also.
The diagram for that is
~(~P->Q)
I'll continue preaching to you about premises as that final argument is logically invalid. It is not the case that if there are inconsistencies in my delivery, that my statement is untrue.
