Forced induction vs naturally aspirated
#32
Re: Forced induction vs naturally aspirated
racegas for a stock h22 with bolt ons . h22's are a good swap i dont know why people dont do it more often. costs the same as doing a gsr swap probably less. my buddies h22 made almost 200 whp with bolt ons and cams tuning with a vafc
#33
Re: Forced induction vs naturally aspirated
Originally Posted by BoosTedZSix
racegas for a stock h22 with bolt ons . h22's are a good swap i dont know why people dont do it more often. costs the same as doing a gsr swap probably less. my buddies h22 made almost 200 whp with bolt ons and cams tuning with a vafc
#34
Re: Forced induction vs naturally aspirated
Originally Posted by projekteg
Originally Posted by BoosTedZSix
racegas for a stock h22 with bolt ons . h22's are a good swap i dont know why people dont do it more often. costs the same as doing a gsr swap probably less. my buddies h22 made almost 200 whp with bolt ons and cams tuning with a vafc
#35
Re: Forced induction vs naturally aspirated
the only thing that isn't bolt up really is swapping to the cable shifter for the tranny. i was going to run the h2b tranny conversion to keep my b16 tranny, but that ****** cost about 1500 bucks just for the adapter kit maybe next summer.
#36
Re: Forced induction vs naturally aspirated
Originally Posted by BoosTedZSix
racegas for a stock h22 with bolt ons . h22's are a good swap i dont know why people dont do it more often. costs the same as doing a gsr swap probably less. my buddies h22 made almost 200 whp with bolt ons and cams tuning with a vafc
#38
Re: Forced induction vs naturally aspirated
Originally Posted by boosted_hatch_216
ive heard that with the h22's that theyre really heavy for autox and track stuff.