dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

04-10-2005, 10:29 PM

#41

Dr.Boost

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 21,479

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

Quote:

Originally Posted by pissedoffsol

550s will get you a little more than 300 at the whells. my 750s were at 78% duty at 289 WHP at 11.8-12.1, stock rail 45-ish psi.

WTF? I've seen planty of people make over 300whp on 450cc injectors. No way were you at 78% with only 289whp on 750cc injectors.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

04-10-2005, 10:31 PM

#42

93turbo16

1.0 BAR

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 425

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

Quote:

Originally Posted by boostedsol

actually kevins basemap and a little fine tuning (2 runs on the dyno)

he actually had the a/f ratio at about 13.3 straight through hes no joke nothing but respect for this man

Is the 13.3 from a basemap.. if so that really isn't too good you know. ALways better to start rather rich and lean it out not the other way around IMO

04-11-2005, 12:53 AM

#43

boostedsol

0.5 BAR

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 97

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

um guys we made on this car 418 whp with only 440cc injectors and now this with 550's as for the dyno it must be off but not by that much come see the car run we will be running it all week cause we have to catch a problem in it

let me know if you want to come up and see this run

04-11-2005, 10:23 AM

#44

projekteg

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 11,058

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

Quote:

Originally Posted by 93turbo16

Is the 13.3 from a basemap.. if so that really isn't too good you know. ALways better to start rather rich and lean it out not the other way around IMO

if this run is from a basemap that i made, then it was not set up for anything other than the stock map sensor (i have never sold a basemap to ANYONE set up for anything other than stock map), with that being said, if he was running 22psi on the stock map sensor, you can only tune up to 11psi, so at 22psi, he'd be getting the same amount of fuel at 22psi as he was at 11psi, that would explain why it was so lean at 13.3 if that's the case.

04-11-2005, 10:26 AM

#45

93turbo16

1.0 BAR

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 425

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

Quote:

Originally Posted by projekteg

Quote:

Originally Posted by 93turbo16

Is the 13.3 from a basemap.. if so that really isn't too good you know. ALways better to start rather rich and lean it out not the other way around IMO

Haha, right on. What a dumbass anyway. I have seen your basemaps. They are good man. Not busting on you one bit.

04-11-2005, 11:35 AM

#46

bermanator

1.0 BAR

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 321

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

The dyno cant be inaccurate. They intersect at 52-whatever rpm is because of the way the computer calculates torque with the HP figures * RPM / 52xx , or something verry close to that. So yeah those dynos are screwed up for whatever reason.

edit- Oh NM I didn't see the increments on the other side. Thats weird.

04-11-2005, 11:36 AM

#47

MikeJ-2009

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 0

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

Why are there no pictures of this car yet?
Why are you referring to the car as a "we" thing? Is this your car?
Will you list what turbo this car is running?
Why would you run two 255lph fuel pumps?

04-11-2005, 11:45 AM

#48

Semnos

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 3,828

Re: dyno run results with uberdata thanks alot kevin

maybe the 2 walboro fuel pumps are the reasons he can make that much power with 550's..?
I saw that myself and it sounded kinda strange, I would expect at least above 800cc .
good job on the setup though...I would suggest to get some bigger injectors though