General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

CRX turbo vs NSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2006, 02:34 PM
  #41  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Walter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,057
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

WFT, the better cars are hondas turbo! Japan rules!
Walter is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 02:54 PM
  #42  
0.5 BAR
 
G13BT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 72
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by random-strike
C6 > all of europe.
Are you joking? Since when cheaper means better??

It still uses leaf springs on the back(not sure if the z06 does)... and some bodypanels are made of plastic... Oh 7000ccīs to get 505bhp and 470 lb-ft... lol... A supercar as to do everything, itīs not all about overall figures... iīm pretty sure a f430 would blow it on a track, completly...

Not to mention all this cars...

Porsche 911 gt3 RS
Ferrarri Enzo, f430 and modena 360cs
Aston Martin Vanquish S v12
koenigsegg CCR and CC8S
Mercedes SLR
Porsche carrera GT
Lamborghini murciélago
TVR tuscan R
Pagani zonda
BMW M5 v10 and M6
Bugatti Veyron 16.4
Lotus sport exige

The only american car worth mentioning in the same frase as "supercar" is the Saleen S7 and it still looks like the old jaguar XJ220 with too many air intakes...

Get real, if you tell me itīs the best "Bang for the buck" i may agree, but itīs not a supercar, itīs just a factory tuned corvette....
G13BT is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 02:58 PM
  #43  
1.0 BAR
 
2BG4HNDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 610
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by SinisterCRX
Pontiac Solstice with the vette engine/tranny/etc > all
Yep.....how does 10.99 at 133 sound? Stupid fast, too bad they spent so damn much money, and who can afford carbon fibre body panels...betcha even with stock body stuff it would still go 10's on real slicks.....
2BG4HNDA is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 03:08 PM
  #44  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Walter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,057
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by G13BT
Are you joking? Since when cheaper means better??

It still uses leaf springs on the back(not sure if the z06 does)... and some bodypanels are made of plastic... Oh 7000ccīs to get 505bhp and 470 lb-ft... lol... A supercar as to do everything, itīs not all about overall figures... iīm pretty sure a f430 would blow it on a track, completly...

Not to mention all this cars...

Porsche 911 gt3 RS
Ferrarri Enzo, f430 and modena 360cs
Aston Martin Vanquish S v12
koenigsegg CCR and CC8S
Mercedes SLR
Porsche carrera GT
Lamborghini murciélago
TVR tuscan R
Pagani zonda
BMW M5 v10 and M6
Bugatti Veyron 16.4
Lotus sport exige

The only american car worth mentioning in the same frase as "supercar" is the Saleen S7 and it still looks like the old jaguar XJ220 with too many air intakes...

Get real, if you tell me itīs the best "Bang for the buck" i may agree, but itīs not a supercar, itīs just a factory tuned corvette....
agree with you but not all things... ferrari is ---- for me.. to have a ferrari is for to say .. "I have a Ferrari..go to some party and to say , i have a ferrari.. only that.. besides it's more expensive, i know a guy that him friend is mechanic of a repair shop of Ferrari and this cars have a lot of problems! but porshe not much..i prefer 100000 times a porshe than ferrari..btw, today went a porshe 911 turbo to when i work (repair shop and shop of tyres.. ) ... i know ferrari cars are fast fast but this have a lot of problems.. i'm sure a headlight cost more than my hatch hahaha..

i think BMW is good too , about buggati is like a ferrari sure!!
Walter is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 03:32 PM
  #45  
0.0 BAR
 
HondaTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by 2BG4HNDA
Yep.....how does 10.99 at 133 sound? Stupid fast, too bad they spent so damn much money, and who can afford carbon fibre body panels...betcha even with stock body stuff it would still go 10's on real slicks.....
Yeah, they went a little nuts with the body modification... ricers :P

Did you notice it beat EVERYTHING, in EVERYTHING?!? Slalom, 0-60, 60-0, 1/4 mile... booyeah
HondaTuner is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 03:36 PM
  #46  
1.0 BAR
 
2BG4HNDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 610
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by SinisterCRX
Yeah, they went a little nuts with the body modification... ricers :P

Did you notice it beat EVERYTHING, in EVERYTHING?!? Slalom, 0-60, 60-0, 1/4 mile... booyeah
Yep....gotta say....i had pleasant dreams of finding a wrecked one and repair it and doing the transplant, till i figured out that i dont have near enough cash, skills, friends,brains and it would take a huge tub of butter and a canoe oar to shoe horn my huge *** into one of em....
2BG4HNDA is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 03:41 PM
  #47  
0.5 BAR
 
G13BT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 72
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Yes Ferrari are austentacious, more in the US then here, and non reliable, but itīs the real deal, their only made with one porpuse in mind, be fast at all cost, no concessions, their pure... everytime a new one is launched is always fastest then the direct competitors, and thereīs a certain thing to them, the noise, the litlle details. like the see trough engine hood, and the soft design...

As you can see iīm a ferrari fan but if someone asks me, whatīs the better car, i would tell: "the porsche is"...
G13BT is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 03:43 PM
  #48  
0.0 BAR
 
HondaTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by 2BG4HNDA
Yep....gotta say....i had pleasant dreams of finding a wrecked one and repair it and doing the transplant, till i figured out that i dont have near enough cash, skills, friends,brains and it would take a huge tub of butter and a canoe oar to shoe horn my huge *** into one of em....
heh, true. I sat in a solstice and had little room to move.. and i'm 6'0" 200 lbs

Eh ferrari's are a waste IMO. It's a way to say "Hey look, I have a TON of money and a tiny dick, want to ride in my car with me?"
HondaTuner is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 03:50 PM
  #49  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Porsche 911 gt3 RS - are you talking about the race car or the road car? both get owned by the c6 in the same category (road/race)
Ferrarri Enzo, f430 and modena 360cs - maybe enzo (costs 1millo) f430 OWNED, modena 360 OWNED x 10
Aston Martin Vanquish S v12 - OWNED x50 weights too much, bascially same power.
koenigsegg CCR and CC8S - 700k +
Mercedes SLR - OWNED IN EVERY ASPECT
Porsche carrera GT - on the same level carrera gt costs 370k more
Lamborghini murciélago - OWNED IN EVERY ASPECT
TVR tuscan R - OWNED IN EVERY ASPECT
Pagani zonda - which one? they all get OWNED except possibly the F which is 500k
BMW M5 v10 and M6 - not even in the same class, doesnt come close to the c6 z06, better match for the c5 z06
Bugatti Veyron 16.4 - costs 4 million
Lotus sport exige - OWNED

"Get real, if you tell me itīs the best "Bang for the buck" i may agree, but itīs not a supercar, itīs just a factory tuned corvette...."

factory tuned corvette, that retails at 65k, and out classes everything europe or japan has to offer under 450k.

c6r dominates every race it comepetes in. i think the c5r and c6r has won 95% of races its been in since the late nineties.
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 03:53 PM
  #50  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

http://www.corvetteracing.com/history/2005_season.shtml
J-SMITH69 is offline  


Quick Reply: CRX turbo vs NSX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.