General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Best Honda to turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2007, 02:00 PM
  #91  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
bush voter?

thanks phil for the hhh break in :-)

fred.
Well actually no. You see, in some places here in america...you can write in your own canidate on the balot. I voted for Rob Zombie. The balot system here is a joke and frankly pointless since the electorial college decides who wins anyway. :P

Simply put regardless as to whether or not you are a ***...You havent contributed anything that would deem you worthy to NOT be called a ***. We dont know you and dont care.

Basically you dont defend ppl who ask dumbass questions (most of which get asked anyway )

The flaming exists to weed out the ppl who want everything done for them and are too damn lazy/ignorant to punch a few keys into the keyboard and find out (not) for themselves. Get used to it.

Have a nice day.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 02:14 PM
  #92  
1.5 BAR
 
fe3tcourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

i still maintain that it wasnt a totally unreasonable question, and if debated in an intelligent way would have made some interesting discussion and reading. why do you think i clicked on it... i was interested to see what the gurus thought... little did i know that i was to be disappointed...

fred.
fe3tcourier is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 02:26 PM
  #93  
0.0 BAR
 
BigD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

No one cares what you were interested in. The reason he is catching so much is the fact it's a stupid generic question. If they answered it there would be 100 dumb post a day. This isn't Honduh-Tech.
BigD is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 02:33 PM
  #94  
1.5 BAR
 
BirdmanMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 997
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
i still maintain that it wasnt a totally unreasonable question, and if debated in an intelligent way would have made some interesting discussion and reading. why do you think i clicked on it... i was interested to see what the gurus thought... little did i know that i was to be disappointed...

fred.
you have said and still have said nothing intelligent. You have not answered the op's post in any manner. You have simply argued with everyone here about why THEY aren't answering the OP's question. Do you have something intelligent to add? Do you know anything about Hondas? if so then please enlighten us. Otherwise go to Honda-tech. This question has been asked a million times. If someone can't use the search we aren't going to bottle feed them. If they dont have the intelligence to us a damn search button, they dont have enough to turbo their car successfully. And if they are asking the question about which is better to turbo, they obviously don't know enough about Honda engines or engines in general to make a concious decision on what engine to work on. Therefore from that i can again conclude they dont have intelligence to work on their car, much less turbo it. You are simply contributing to the idiocy of the noobs that come to this site. Look at the post down the page about the guy asking how much his car is worth. He decides to work on it and what do we do? WE HELP HIM. He might have some legitimate questions about his project, this OP does not.
Thanks that is all. FIIA. CRX. HHH. ROFLIMHKP. URGAY

P.S.- That comment on "bush voter" showed how truly ignorant you are to things outside your country. You flaming people because they use base words like "***" and "queer" is no better than you grouping an entire country on your knowledge of one or two americans. Most americans are not fat and lazy, and those that are aren't disproportionate to the population any more than any other country. So stop grouping because you make yourself seem like an ignorant jackass.

(and that is how you noob bash, my freinds)


EDIT!:!:!: Dude you are going to hell. i bashed you on my post #666. DAMN you suck
BirdmanMD is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 02:50 PM
  #95  
1.0 BAR
 
losesomethinbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 556
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
Its still wednesday here in america.... :P

And thats all that really matters.
11:55am on the west coast, not even noon yet
losesomethinbra is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 02:58 PM
  #96  
3.0 BAR
 
bigdaddyvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,631
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

Originally Posted by BirdmanMD

(and that is how you noob bash, my freinds)


I STILL PREFER ------.





And for you my courier ****** friend:

By "looks slow"... I meant IS slow... All that work and a 13 even at 15 pounds.... you suck lol


CHEERS... MATE......


---- it even sounds gay when I say it....

Take your stupid ------- *** to hondatech. Im sure most of the idiots will jock it if for nothing else due to originality... The mods will love you there.....

Id have banned your ****** *** already.
bigdaddyvtec is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 03:30 PM
  #97  
1.5 BAR
 
fe3tcourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

Originally Posted by BirdmanMD
you have said and still have said nothing intelligent. You have not answered the op's post in any manner. You have simply argued with everyone here about why THEY aren't answering the OP's question. Do you have something intelligent to add? Do you know anything about Hondas? if so then please enlighten us. Otherwise go to Honda-tech. This question has been asked a million times. If someone can't use the search we aren't going to bottle feed them. If they dont have the intelligence to us a damn search button, they dont have enough to turbo their car successfully. And if they are asking the question about which is better to turbo, they obviously don't know enough about Honda engines or engines in general to make a concious decision on what engine to work on. Therefore from that i can again conclude they dont have intelligence to work on their car, much less turbo it. You are simply contributing to the idiocy of the noobs that come to this site. Look at the post down the page about the guy asking how much his car is worth. He decides to work on it and what do we do? WE HELP HIM. He might have some legitimate questions about his project, this OP does not.
Thanks that is all. FIIA. CRX. HHH. ROFLIMHKP. URGAY
then ignore it... no one will keep asking questions if they dont get answers. it takes only a few seconds to post something like :

88 crx with b16a because good head flow, reasonable box, all hondas have highish compression, light chassis

or whatever.

my point is, post if you have something to contribute. if you dont, or dont want to, dont post. thats what i had to contribute, rark you ******* up a bit and squeeze a few answers out of some of the better more astute members.

P.S.- That comment on "bush voter" showed how truly ignorant you are to things outside your country. You flaming people because they use base words like "***" and "queer" is no better than you grouping an entire country on your knowledge of one or two americans. Most americans are not fat and lazy, and those that are aren't disproportionate to the population any more than any other country. So stop grouping because you make yourself seem like an ignorant jackass.
unfortunately for you, i am familiar with the public health statistics of your country. i do not, and have not based any opinions on "1 or 2" yanks comments. i have on the other hand based my opinion of some of you on your posts. fortunately for this community, some members have stuck their heads up and said you lot are a bunch of inbred monkeys with little to contribute, and i dont just mean via the few posts here and in that other thread. i have recieved pms too, quite a few of them. there are a disproportionate number of morbidly obese yanks, and canadians, and it is a fact, not conjecture. yes, more by percentage than other countries. and no, i'm not at home in mine, which is a particularly good one for many many reasons even if the politicians are trying their hardest to make it worse and worse blinded by $$ signs in their eyes.

i happen to know at least half a dozen americans that arent ignorant, or fat that i quite like... keep your judgments on my speculative judgements to yourself...

(and that is how you noob bash, my freinds)
keep it coming, can you say sponge (hmmm, a reference to these peoples intelligence, or my ability to absorb these coments till i start growing grey hair, heaven forbid i forget to take this little comment out before i hit post)

EDIT!:!:!: Dude you are going to hell. i bashed you on my post #666. DAMN you suck
fortunately for you, there isnt one, however, if there was, i am 100% certain that you have a far far higher chance of getting in there than me ;-)

i know how you lot love that little symbol.

12 seconds, and able to drag 3 hondas on its back while pulling a 16 beats 12 seconds and able to be reduced to art by a strong gust of wind.

it will go faster than the current roughly 12.5. and more importantly, it will lap fast once i sort out the weight bias and suspension and brake tuning.

so its not light, woo de doo.

its about 400kg, or 880pounds lighter than an R33 gtr, and faster than a stocker. good enough by me considering that the r34 gtr (weighing about the same, with similar power and torque) held the first official production car record in the 8m range at the nurburgring.

fred.
fe3tcourier is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 03:50 PM
  #98  
3.0 BAR
 
bigdaddyvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,631
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

lmao



you still here





































































why?
bigdaddyvtec is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 03:52 PM
  #99  
3.0 BAR
 
ososlohatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,036
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
then ignore it... no one will keep asking questions if they dont get answers. it takes only a few seconds to post something like :

88 crx with b16a because good head flow, reasonable box, all hondas have highish compression, light chassis

or whatever.

my point is, post if you have something to contribute. if you dont, or dont want to, dont post. thats what i had to contribute, rark you ******* up a bit and squeeze a few answers out of some of the better more astute members.

unfortunately for you, i am familiar with the public health statistics of your country. i do not, and have not based any opinions on "1 or 2" yanks comments. i have on the other hand based my opinion of some of you on your posts. fortunately for this community, some members have stuck their heads up and said you lot are a bunch of inbred monkeys with little to contribute, and i dont just mean via the few posts here and in that other thread. i have recieved pms too, quite a few of them. there are a disproportionate number of morbidly obese yanks, and canadians, and it is a fact, not conjecture. yes, more by percentage than other countries. and no, i'm not at home in mine, which is a particularly good one for many many reasons even if the politicians are trying their hardest to make it worse and worse blinded by $$ signs in their eyes.

i happen to know at least half a dozen americans that arent ignorant, or fat that i quite like... keep your judgments on my speculative judgements to yourself...

keep it coming, can you say sponge (hmmm, a reference to these peoples intelligence, or my ability to absorb these coments till i start growing grey hair, heaven forbid i forget to take this little comment out before i hit post)

fortunately for you, there isnt one, however, if there was, i am 100% certain that you have a far far higher chance of getting in there than me ;-)

i know how you lot love that little symbol.

12 seconds, and able to drag 3 hondas on its back while pulling a 16 beats 12 seconds and able to be reduced to art by a strong gust of wind.

it will go faster than the current roughly 12.5. and more importantly, it will lap fast once i sort out the weight bias and suspension and brake tuning.

so its not light, woo de doo.

its about 400kg, or 880pounds lighter than an R33 gtr, and faster than a stocker. good enough by me considering that the r34 gtr (weighing about the same, with similar power and torque) held the first official production car record in the 8m range at the nurburgring.

fred.
if you weren't 1/2 jackass you'd read and say he didnt want to do a swap, he said stock engine honda, so by you sayn crx with a b16 ( didnt come stock in america) you have the worst answer so far, congrats numb nuts, he'd have to get a del sol with a factory b16 or a 99-00 si coupe, maybe you should learn a few things before you act like a know it all, but since your just die'n for an honest answer i'd go with a da gsr with the b17a1 or a 94+ gsr, since those bottoms end hold the most horsepower for a factory mass production honduh drop dead fred and since when is anything under 10:1 high compression (referring to b17a1)
ososlohatch is offline  
Old 07-11-2007, 04:28 PM
  #100  
3.0 BAR
 
Dr.Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Default Re: Best Honda to turbo?

Does anybody still care?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Dr.Boost is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whiterice
Forced Induction
0
07-09-2007 04:37 PM
TinyTubs
Fabrication
27
02-22-2007 02:06 AM
HMTdmc
General Discussion
15
12-13-2006 11:21 PM
djnikko
General Discussion
15
03-21-2003 04:25 AM



Quick Reply: Best Honda to turbo?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM.