B18 Stroker Cranks... Tuner Toys wants your opinions.
11-06-2006, 09:51 PM
#31
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: B18 Stroker Cranks... Tuner Toys wants your opinions.
Build a NA engine that spins pretty high (depending on stroke, 9K would do, for the smaller strokes 9500) and then tear it apart at the 500 mile mark to check bearing wear. Replace and tear apart again after 1000 miles. That should tell all, and pictures are worth a thousand words.
A shitty RS is great for a turbo engine, the dense AF mix ignites super fast, and the piston drops way down super quick decompressing it before it goes bang. Good stuff.
A shitty RS is great for a turbo engine, the dense AF mix ignites super fast, and the piston drops way down super quick decompressing it before it goes bang. Good stuff.
11-18-2006, 12:18 AM
#34
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 397
Re: B18 Stroker Cranks... Tuner Toys wants your opinions.
any one figure out whats wrong with stroking a boosted motor?
HCI last year did a b16 stroked to a 2liter and boosted it, made ~750bhp, i have the article somewhere it was a good read.
not that i think of it. The GM ecotec that makes 1400hp is a de-stroked 2.2l ecotec..de-stroked to a 2.0l. the point was that the shorter stroke put less stress on the cylinder walls during combustion because of the rod/piston angle put to much force on the cylinder wall with a 2.2l
could be the same issue here.
HCI last year did a b16 stroked to a 2liter and boosted it, made ~750bhp, i have the article somewhere it was a good read.
not that i think of it. The GM ecotec that makes 1400hp is a de-stroked 2.2l ecotec..de-stroked to a 2.0l. the point was that the shorter stroke put less stress on the cylinder walls during combustion because of the rod/piston angle put to much force on the cylinder wall with a 2.2l
could be the same issue here.
11-18-2006, 01:23 AM
#35
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,463
Re: B18 Stroker Cranks... Tuner Toys wants your opinions.
Originally Posted by junkyard racer
Craig, just curious what the verdict was on these? Im about to pick up 2 B18C motors and wouldnt mind stroking one of them. 
Thanks from Craig
11-18-2006, 02:26 PM
#38
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,656
Re: B18 Stroker Cranks... Tuner Toys wants your opinions.
Originally Posted by volumeking333
not that i think of it. The GM ecotec that makes 1400hp is a de-stroked 2.2l ecotec..de-stroked to a 2.0l. the point was that the shorter stroke put less stress on the cylinder walls during combustion because of the rod/piston angle put to much force on the cylinder wall with a 2.2l
could be the same issue here.
Bisi' also has a DE-stroked F22A...its destroked to 2.0 levels.....then bored as far as they could go
11-18-2006, 02:57 PM
#39
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: B18 Stroker Cranks... Tuner Toys wants your opinions.
Originally Posted by TunerToys
We're going to buy a couple, try one out ourselves, and have a member here on the board who wants one. Not sure if we are going to carry these as a regular item yet. But will keep you guys posted.
Thanks from Craig
Thanks from Craig
The all motor crowd has already leaned to the k series world and really when you can make 600 whp on a 84x89 motor with a good manifold/head set up well no need for a bigger motor
11-18-2006, 03:21 PM
#40
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,109
Re: B18 Stroker Cranks... Tuner Toys wants your opinions.
Originally Posted by chris
The demand for 95mm cranks imo just isnt there
The all motor crowd has already leaned to the k series world
The all motor crowd has already leaned to the k series world
