Another political thread....
09-30-2004, 04:50 PM
#21
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,950
Re:Another political thread....
Now we're working on Bin Laden? Maybe we should have done that 3 years ago. The war in Iraq was a pre-emptive strike with no evidence of anything. Bush blatantly lied about the WMD's and made the people of the US so afraid of "terror" that he thought he could perpetrate a war on lies. Lets hope everybody smartens up before election time. BTW, I'll be watching the debates tonight, we can argue about that afterwards. 
09-30-2004, 04:56 PM
#25
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,950
Re:Another political thread....
Originally Posted by 5sfe-camry
Originally Posted by nonvtec
Kerry: George, you lied about everything ever.
Bush: Dick told me to, I'm just a cowboy
Bush: Dick told me to, I'm just a cowboy
You win man, you win
09-30-2004, 05:35 PM
#27
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Re:Another political thread....
Originally Posted by nonvtec
Originally Posted by 5sfe-camry
Originally Posted by nonvtec
Kerry: George, you lied about everything ever.
Bush: Dick told me to, I'm just a cowboy
Bush: Dick told me to, I'm just a cowboy
You win man, you win
09-30-2004, 05:42 PM
#28
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7
Re:Another political thread....
You woulda done the same thing if you had roughly 5 different countries, their intelligence agencies, and all of yours telling you that Saddam had WMDs. And why didn't Clinton go after Bin Laden in '93 the first time he bombed the WTC. 6 people were killed and over 1K injured. Then after that Saudi Arabia offered him to us. Thanks to Clinton's "wisdom" and "unmatched insight", he declined the offer. So I don't get it when you hear liberals blame Bush for 9/11.
09-30-2004, 05:48 PM
#29
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re:Another political thread....
Yeah, Bush thought that they had WMD's for sure because the CIA told him that. I don't know where else you want him to get his info.
When the U.N. said "SADDAM, IF YOU DON'T COMPLY WITH THE WEAPONS INSPECTORS THIS TIME, YOU WILL FACE MILITARY ACTION" they were lying, but we weren't. That's why we're in Iraq.
Quit with the WMD ----. Yes, we did think they were there (even John Kerry admitted he did) and then they weren't there. But the bottom line is that we went there because Saddam refused the weapons inspectors after he was threatened with military action. The U.N. aren't man enough to carry through with it, but we were.
Sorry to have to set you straight.
When the U.N. said "SADDAM, IF YOU DON'T COMPLY WITH THE WEAPONS INSPECTORS THIS TIME, YOU WILL FACE MILITARY ACTION" they were lying, but we weren't. That's why we're in Iraq.
Quit with the WMD ----. Yes, we did think they were there (even John Kerry admitted he did) and then they weren't there. But the bottom line is that we went there because Saddam refused the weapons inspectors after he was threatened with military action. The U.N. aren't man enough to carry through with it, but we were.
Sorry to have to set you straight.
09-30-2004, 05:49 PM
#30
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Re:Another political thread....
Originally Posted by ryandaley
You woulda done the same thing if you had roughly 5 different countries, their intelligence agencies, and all of yours telling you that Saddam had WMDs. And why didn't Clinton go after Bin Laden in '93 the first time he bombed the WTC. 6 people were killed and over 1K injured. Then after that Saudi Arabia offered him to us. Thanks to Clinton's "wisdom" and "unmatched insight", he declined the offer. So I don't get it when you hear liberals blame Bush for 9/11.
