Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

low mount turbo header

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2009, 05:23 PM
  #61  
0.5 BAR
 
rExin_you_out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Default

stock is gay anyway, boost that ---- regaurdless of what it is =)
rExin_you_out is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:32 PM
  #62  
0.5 BAR
 
jared529's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 81
Default

Originally Posted by rExin_you_out
cuz he has fwd chevy v6 = pain the the mother ------- ***
it a 4cyl.
jared529 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:40 PM
  #63  
0.5 BAR
 
icemike89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 125
Default

Thanks for posting all those times you read off the internet, they matter soo much in realy life. Climb down off your dsm's ******* and go check out some quad4 or gm boards, and look at real times. Hell I just bought some parts off a guy with a 91 grand am HO that runs 15.1 at 90mph with just an intake, which of course youll prolly say Im bullshitting or something but thats just one example.

Oh and btw, my cars a twin cam not a quad 4
icemike89 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 08:21 PM
  #64  
0.5 BAR
 
rExin_you_out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Default

gms are def fast.

untill they break hah, which they do all to often - the point

They take a shity design and push it so its fast

honda takes a good design and limits it so its reliable
rExin_you_out is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 08:24 PM
  #65  
0.5 BAR
 
rExin_you_out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Default

my friend had a nice 96ish grand am gt, the smaller ones. ---- was quick and could chirp second nice stock but it was junk

i even owned one onces *shrugs* a nice 94 convertable cavalier with the 3.4 pos.

was quick as hell for an auto but talk about never ending problems on a 120k car
rExin_you_out is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 08:27 PM
  #66  
0.5 BAR
 
rExin_you_out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Default

i had a 89 lude with 250k, i regasketed it and it ran strong as ---- and ran high 15s till i sold it at like 280k still in near mint condition.
rExin_you_out is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 09:44 PM
  #67  
0.5 BAR
 
Oxide_Zer0yome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 85
Default

reguardless what u have, i've seen plenty of gm pos grand am grand prix's turbo non-turbo,quad 4,dual cam,hunks of trash
Oxide_Zer0yome is offline  
Old 07-01-2009, 03:40 AM
  #68  
1.0 BAR
 
2BarRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago Il
Posts: 300
Default

the ecotec isnt really a shitty engine just needs to be put in a better car. they need put the ecotec in the volt chassis that would be a fun ride
2BarRacing is offline  
Old 07-01-2009, 03:47 AM
  #69  
0.0 BAR
 
MacNeil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by rExin_you_out
my friend had a nice 96ish grand am gt, the smaller ones. ---- was quick and could chirp second nice stock but it was junk

i even owned one onces *shrugs* a nice 94 convertable cavalier with the 3.4 pos.was quick as hell for an auto but talk about never ending problems on a 120k car
Unless it was swapped in not a chance, and those things aren't that bad, if it was tuned properly and had everything done right wouldn't have had a single problem adn it would have ahd better gas milage then any other cav also
MacNeil is offline  
Old 07-01-2009, 03:52 AM
  #70  
1.0 BAR
 
2BarRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago Il
Posts: 300
Default

omg we have gotten so off topic its funny why dont we start posting ****
2BarRacing is offline  


Quick Reply: low mount turbo header



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.